#image_title
Did Obama vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump in 2016?
Guest post by Martel Maxim.
Oh how far we’ve come since Tina Peters (see https://tinapeters.us/) and President Trump cracked open the Deep State’s Deepest and Darkest Secret – that the secret is of how elections are stolen on a national magnitude.
Through stolen elections, especially during the last 25 years in the age of Computerized voting, the Deep State has successfully assembled and infested a network of controlled and compromised individuals into a great deal of positions of political power in our country.
Anyway, the lightning fast speed of computers interconnected throughout the entire election ecosystem has ironically resulted in a laughingly obvious collection of bizarre political misfits and ‘leadership’ that unfortunately almost ended America as we know it. If it wasn’t so serious, it actually would be funny.
Characters that hide behind the ‘color of law’ such as Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Pocahontas, Mitch McConnell, Bernie Sanders, AOC, Colorado SOS Jena Griswold, and good ole Chuck Schumer are just some of the top show headliners, and so many more from the land of the compromised and controlled (Hundreds) who back them up. At least Chuck Schumer gets some ‘America saving credit’ for exposing the depravity of the Deep State by telling President Trump his famous “6 Ways to Sunday” disclosure that put all of us on notice regarding the existence of the Deep State, and how it operates. JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, and so many others sadly learned about this first hand.
Thank God that President Trump “broke the Deep State’s computerized cheating algorithms” by indeed making the Presidential election of 2024 “too big to rig”. However, “too big to rig” didn’t really work for House or Senate races which they continue to steal as we speak.
We cannot rest, because there are not many House or Senate Candidates running in the 2026 Midterms who can claim a “too big to rig” status, therefore the ability of the Deep State to rig the Midterms must be prevented. In order to end this reign of terror, the machines and all their lying cheating software have got to go out the window for at least the Federal races in the 2026 Primary and General Midterms, starting with the primaries beginning in less than a year. Although it may be difficult to put in place a viable hand count system developed and deployed within about 6 months, we have no choice at this point, and it’s being worked on as a number one priority.
In 2016, when President Obama just might have opened the door to acknowledging 2020 was stolen. The last 15 seconds of this video are perhaps the most important 15 seconds on YouTube that makes this point.
Although Obama speaks in broad terms on this video, he says,
“If Mr. Trump is up 10 or 15 points on election day and ends up losing, then maybe he can raise some questions”.
The common sense interpretation of that statement is: “If there’s a notable deviation from historical precedent on how elections normally proceed”, then maybe he can raise some questions”. Assuming that’s a reasonable interpretation, let’s look at what he didn’t include in that sentence.
First of all, he didn’t say when during the election cycle his measurements were to be taken. Let’s assume that if during the first hour of voting (back in 2016 they hadn’t yet done the mass mail out ballot and early voting extremes), that Trump was ahead, but ended up losing somewhat later during the day, then that scenario would be hard to dispute if Trump had lost.
However, in 2020 President Trump was largely ahead of Biden, ranging from approximately 5-7 points in all swing states when 90+ percent of the vote was in. That is, until the magic 3am ballot drops occurred along with the quick catch-up miracle spikes as shown in the below charts.
These spikes were met with Deep State comments like “don’t believe what you see” and dystopian headlines like: “How Real-Time Visualizations of Vote Count ‘Spikes Can Lead to Unfounded Allegations of Election Fraud”. In other words, “your common sense interpretation of the charts doesn’t apply”.
The same dystopian deep state control led practically all US courts to reject any challenges to the 2020 results as ‘not having standing’. That same logic was the engine that persecuted and prosecuted Tina Peters for exposing their system of fraud. You can also see that same pattern with their lawfare against President Trump these past 10 years.
The propaganda masters fail to let it be known that this same sequence of events occurred in all the Swing States, practically all at the same time. In other words, lightning didn’t just strike twice, it struck 7 times, practically all at the same time. Remarkable!
So former President Obama, what do you have to say about all this? Do these circumstances reach a reasonable threshold intent of what you said in the above video? Do these noted deviations in how 2020 was conducted in light of historical data raise your curiosity? If that was you in place of President Trump, and you didn’t lose by 10-15 points, but instead lost by slim amounts shown in the spike charts all at around the same time, ….would you think ‘something just wasn’t right’?
Would you still agree with Chris Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) who played a pivotal role in ensuring the security of the 2020 U.S. presidential election when he publicly stated that the November 3rd election was “the most secure in American history,” emphasizing that there was no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised. Would you wonder what planet he lived on?
So let’s get back to your video. If indeed a threshold of reasonableness was reached in the above information, would you then say that President Trump had validity to have never conceded that 2020 election? Would you also agree that what Tina Peters exposed has great validity? By the way, nobody in authority ever had an interest in reading those reports, especially your former Voter Protection Attorney, and now Colorado SOS Jena Griswold. Griswold’s only mission has been to “shoot the messenger, Tina Peters”. Something just does not sit right about all of this.
So President Obama, as America wakes up, it will demand more answers to common sense questions like the above. The choice on how you want to be remembered in history is up to you, and this situation is a litmus test of how you will navigate that test on behalf of those people who believed in you. Those 15 seconds in your video says a lot.
We can’t unsee what we’ve now seen, especially as Tina Peters remains in prison for doing what was right.
The post Did Obama Vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump Back in 2016? first appeared on Joe Hoft.
The post Did Obama Vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump Back in 2016? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.