Kaja Kallas at the European Council in June 2024/Attribution: © European Union, 1998 – 2026
Guest post by Drieu Godefridi
Through her stupidity and fanaticism, Kaja Kallas is threatening Europe’s vital interests. She must go.
Kaja Kallas? Kaja who? You’ve probably never heard her name, or only in passing.
That’s the whole problem with the EU: here is someone who is High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, as well as Vice-President of the European Commission, and you’ve hardly ever heard of her.
The fact is that the EU is a bureaucracy with considerable power, which it uses in a more than questionable manner, and the only thing democratic about it is a Potemkin Parliament, which is prohibited from initiating any legislation…
Within this stifling bureaucracy, Estonia’s Kaja Kallas has been playing a disastrous yet decisive role since December 2024. Two cases illustrate this: the tragedy of the failed confiscation of Russian assets, and the sad case of Mr. Baud.
The Kremlin’s gold
In the three-act tragedy of Russian assets that has just played out, Kallas is everywhere.
First, as Prime Minister of Estonia. Estonia was the first country to vote on Kallas’ initiative to pass a law allowing the seizure of all Russian assets in Estonia, even those belonging to public banks. This was outright confiscation based on a purely administrative decision, meaning that the “targets” concerned were unable to defend themselves or even express their views. If you are Russian, you have to pay up, and we will take everything from you, please remain silent! This is questionable, to say the least, from the point of view of the rule of law.
At the time, Ms. Kallas’ government expressly stated its intention to extend the “mechanism” — i.e., outright theft — to the assets of the Central Bank of Russia throughout Europe.
The fact is that many Estonians, and Kaja Kallas in particular, harbor a kind of hatred mixed with terror toward Russia. This is understandable given their history: a small Baltic people ‘liberated’ by the Soviets in 1945, who were then martyred for 45 years under the infect Soviet communist regime: deportations, ‘Russification’, dictatorship, misery and mediocrity everywhere. This Russophobia is therefore based on very legitimate grounds.
However, hatred and fear do not justify everything. The administrative and therefore arbitrary confiscation of Russian assets, fantasized and then implemented by Kallas in Estonia, is in direct violation of international law.
Given that this concerned a total of 38 million euros (million, not billion) in Russian assets in Estonia, little was said about it.
But Kallas is not stopping there. What she is really aiming for is the administrative confiscation of all Russian assets in Europe, including those of the Central Bank of Russia: €210 billion in total. What a haul! The biggest heist of all time.
Kallas maneuvers so well that in December 2024 she becomes EU Foreign Minister. And what was just an idea in the air at the EU level becomes a project that Kallas will use all her bureaucratic power to bring about: the administrative confiscation of all the assets of the Russian Central Bank. By simple administrative decision: decree of the Prince.
We will not go into detail about the rational arguments that defeated Kallas’ insane project: violation of international law, inevitable repayment, Belgium’s entry into financial slavery to Russia for a hundred years. In short, Kallas and her accomplices attempted to impose on Russia the treatment usually reserved for the defeated, even before the end of a war that all indications suggest Russia will not lose. Pure madness.
But the real news is that the EU came within a hair’s breadth of making this madness its official policy. It took only one country, one man in fact — the man Orbán called a “hero:” Prime minister of Belgium, Bart De Wever — to prevent the EU from simply and unanimously entering an asylum, taking with it the stability of the international financial system.
The real news is that for months, the EU was effectively “represented” by a person with a very low IQ, who spouted false arguments every day in front of the cameras, incapable of responding in a rational manner to any of the arguments against her childish predatory ambitions.
The Baud case
And then there is the Baud case, which has been little discussed, given that Mr. Baud’s administrative excommunication came in the midst of the Russian asset crisis.
Jacques Baud, a former Swiss army colonel and ex-strategic intelligence agent, was sanctioned by the EU on December 15, 2025. These sanctions, decided by the Council of the EU, target individuals accused of participating in Russian destabilization activities, in particular through the manipulation of information and the dissemination of propaganda in connection with the war in Ukraine—a category so vague that it can encompass almost anything and anyone.
The EU accuses Jacques Baud of acting as a “spokesperson for Russian propaganda” and spreading conspiracy theories. In particular, he is accused of claiming that Ukraine orchestrated its own invasion to facilitate its accession to NATO. According to the official text, he supported or implemented actions undermining the stability and security of Ukraine through disinformation. This wording criminalizes freedom of expression by administrative decree.
In concrete terms, the measures include freezing his assets in the EU, banning him from entering or transiting through EU territory, and prohibiting European entities from providing him with funds or doing business with him. A modern arsenal of civil elimination.
Jacques Baud vigorously contests these accusations, denies any links with Moscow, and has announced his intention to refer the matter to the Council of the EU and the Court of Justice of the European Union. As a resident of Brussels, he is particularly affected by these sanctions, which effectively expel him from society.
Switzerland, which generally aligns its sanctions with those of the EU for economic and financial measures directly related to the invasion of Ukraine, has not adopted the specific regime relating to “hybrid threats,” according to the EU’s Kafkaesque jargon. The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has confirmed that Switzerland does not apply sanctions targeting disinformation and propaganda, as they undermine freedom of expression, which is less negotiable in Switzerland than in Brussels.
It is important to emphasize that Mr. Baud’s civil death sentence was handed down on a purely administrative basis, without any respect for the rights of the defense.
The procedure for this type of sanction targeting ‘disinformation’ is based entirely on and requires a proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, followed by adoption by the Council of the European Union (in this case, decision CFSP 2025/2572 of December 15, 2025).
Baud is civilly dead in Europe because Ms. Kaja Kallas does not like his ideas.
It should be noted that Mr. Baud is not accused of any illegal act, only of spreading ideas and opinions that Ms. Kallas finds disagreeable. This is a complete denial of the rule of law and freedom of expression, transforming politics into a court of ideas. It is France in 1793: “We do not negotiate! We kill!”
In reality, Ms. Kallas is behaving like a hysterical person in the strict Freudian sense: someone who is unable to manage her unacknowledged hatreds and expresses them in delirious outbursts.
If Europe wants to survive, Kallas must go.
Drieu Godefridi is a PhD from the Sorbonne and a leading voice on European lost sovereignty.
Follow Drieu on X.
The post Through Her Stupidity and Fanaticism, Kaja Kallas is Threatening Europe’s Vital Interests appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.